Friday, 26 June 2015

Will the "True Islam" Please Stand Up!


The Qur'an says in verse 32 of Sura Yunus:

 فَذَلِكُمُ اللَّهُ رَبُّكُمُ الْحَقُّ فَمَاذَا بَعْدَ الْحَقِّ إِلاَّ الضَّلالُ
"Such is God, your Lord the Truth and what is beyond Truth but error?" (10:32)

In other words, God is the only truth - everything else is error. Yet the nature of God and indeed his very existence is beyond human reason & logic. This shows us that while ultimate truth may well exist, it is beyond our ability to comprehend it and so from our human perspective we cannot be dogmatic & insistent about metaphysical truths.

I just heard on the news as I was coming for Jum'a today that there have been terrorist attacks in Tunisia, Kuwait and France. As always, I hear people declaring that these people have "absolutely nothing to do with Islam." The same is said about ISIS and about the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris, the attacks in Madrid, London, Bali & 911. The extremists behind all these have "absolutely nothing to do with Islam" and furthermore "they are not Muslims!"

I want to make an earnest plea to all my Muslim brothers and sisters, please, please let's stop repeating such ridiculous platitudes. Yes, I know the vast majority of Muslims reject such violent interpretations of Islam, but whether we like it or not they do have something to do with Islam and denying that not only makes us look foolish but much worse than that we are ignoring the problem and avoiding tackling how we interpret and treat the Islamic texts. Because only by tackling the very nature of how we understand these texts will we be able to truly confront and defeat these violent & literalist interpretations.

These groups use the very same Qur'an & the very same books of Hadith as we do. Yes, our interpretations differ - but if we keep pretending that what they do has "Nothing to do with Islam" then we will never be able to discredit them, nor offer a convincing counter narrative?

No-one is fooled by such platitudes anymore - and I'm not just talking about non-Muslims, I'm talking about Muslims themselves. The younger generation looking for for a cause to to fight and a reason to rebel against authority. They are not fooled by our pretence that "It has nothing to do with Islam."

Most Muslims don't actually know much about Islam. This is the reality. Youngsters go to their local mosque or onto the internet and are told by Tom Dick and Harry (or rather by Tariq, Dawood and Haroun) that the Qur'an says: "Oh you who believe! Do not take the Jews and the Christians as friends." That it says: "Kill them wherever you find them." That it says: "When you meet the unbelievers, strike their necks until you have inflicted great slaughter upon them." That hadith says: أمرت أن أقاتل الناس حتى يشهدوا أن لا إله إلا الله "I have been ordered to fight people until they declare there is no God but God" That it says: من بدل دينه فاقتلوه "He who changes his religion kill him" and so on…

They then take them at face value and who can blame them? They don't have the nuanced understanding that we would like them to have. They don't understand why you are telling them that it doesn't mean what it plainly seems to mean. They don't buy our explanation that it needs to be read in its context or that it shouldn't be taken literally (though verses we approve of can be taken literally.) All they see is the reality of a world full of injustice and suffering and political leaders coming out with meaningless platitudes. The extremists on the other hand tell them they are fighting to make Muslims great again to bring us back to the "True Islam" of the prophet and his companions & to re-establish the Islamic caliphate which will usher in a utopia of peace, love and justice. All we need to do is return to the "True Islam" and follow it faithfully down to the tiniest detail. Making sure our beard is the right length, our sirwal is raised off the ground and our miswak ready to hand.

I remember when I was about 19 years old I was invited to attent a "Jama'atu-Tableegh" gathering at the main Mosque in Dewsbury. While there I listened to one of the "Maulanas" relate the following story about companions of the prophet during Jihad:

“During the conquest of Egypt, the Muslim army was having great difficulty in defeating the enemy. When Omar heard of this he said it must be because of a deed they have committed. So the Muslim fighters asked themselves if they were neglecting any religious duty, but they found they were not. Then they asked themselves if they had neglected any Sunnah (practice of the Prophet) and they discovered that they had forgotten to brush their teeth using the Miswak. So they got together and started using the Miswak. Once the enemy saw this they thought the Muslims were preparing to eat them alive and so fled!"

Now I have no doubt that this story is a complete fabrication. But as a young 19 year-old eager to follow "True Islam" faithfully I and other youngsters there, were taken in by such nonsense. I stayed two weeks in the mosque and soon found every second of my day was now controlled and defined by this or that Sunnah. When going to the toilet I was taught to clean myself in a certain way and utter a certain prayer (du'a) when entering and leaving the toilet. There were du'a for almost every move I made. I was told that Islam even regulated the way I slept and on my second night I was rebuked by the Amir for sleeping the wrong way! He explained that a Muslim should never sleep with his feet pointing towards Mecca. I must sleep facing Mecca. I wasn’t sure if he meant my head should be pointing towards it or my face should be. To be on the safe side I kept my face in the direction of Mecca and prevented myself from turning side to side as I normally did, which made it very uncomfortable and difficult to sleep.

I became increasingly concerned that such a high level of attention to form and detail was not sustainable outside the sheltered environment of the mosque and worried about my salvation if I was unable to maintain it. But it was difficult to voice this concern in an atmosphere where group mentality strongly disapproved of any failure to live up to the standards set. The Maulana seemed to take pride in how hard and difficult it was to practise Islam properly and said that Prophet Muhammad had said:

“A time will come upon people wherein the one steadfast to his religion will be like one holding a burning coal.”

The sheikh explained that in this day and age to be a good Muslim is like clasping hold of a red hot piece of coal. One instinctively wants to throw it away, but one must resist the instinct and grab it tightly if one wants to achieve Paradise and avoid Hell. A ‘true’ Muslim had to sacrifice the comforts and pleasures of the world for austerity and hardship in order to gain the comforts and pleasures of paradise. He must expect to be thought of as a weird and strange by non-Muslims and suffer ridicule from the society around him, as the prophet said:

“Islam began as something strange, and it will revert to being strange as it was in the beginning, so good tidings for the strangers.” Someone asked, “Who are the strangers?” The Prophet replied, “The ones who break away from their people for the sake of Islam.”

Although we had only stayed in the mosque for two weeks, it seemed much longer, and I felt apprehensive about returning to ‘the real world’ with its evil temptations ready to entice me away from God. It was a disorientating feeling and I can see how easily young Muslims can fall into a very literalist and extremist mindset. Fortunately for myself I soon found that returning to the ‘real world’ and my university studies gave me back a balanced perspective and I realised that Jama'atu Tableegh’s obsession with form and ritual was a distorted perception of Islam. I thought of the verse that says: “God does not task a soul beyond what it can bear,” and how my father always taught me that "religion is ease and not hardship." The needs of the next world did not have to be in conflict with the reality of this world. I sought a more sophisticated and deeper appreciation of Islam than my brief encounter with Jama'atu-Tableegh offered.

But the experience made me realise how easy it was for youngsters to slip into a very obsessive mindset and lose touch with reality. How once they go down that road it is very hard to come back. Some eventually do realise how shallow and superficial such a literalist understanding is as they mature & gain a deeper appreciation. I remember Sheikh Abdul Hakim Murad even coined the term: "Salafi Burnout" to describe this phenomena. Sadly too many only realise the falsehood of such narrow literalism far too late and after doing much harm to themselves, as well as others.

At the heart of the problem is a battle for "True Islam" and one often hears people saying things like: "That is not true Islam" or "They are not real Muslims."  Ironically I even hear it from right-wing bigots & xenophobes who rather perversely seem to want to convince everyone - including Muslims themselves - that peaceful forms of Islam are wrong and that "True Islam" is the harsh literalist version followed by groups like ISIS. The reason they do this is because they want to justify their hatred towards Islam & Muslims and convince people that Islam must be destroyed.

Muslims themselves also play this game of "True Islam". Every group of Muslims will tell you, "Yes! There is a "True Islam!" and if you ask them which one is it? They'll tell you: "It's the one I follow!"

But is there really such a thing as 'True Islam'?

The fact is Muslims differ widely about Islam and always have done. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact it is a very good thing. Even Prophet Muhammad himself did & said different things at different points of his lifetime and in reaction to and according to the circumstances he faced.

Islam has always been a multitude of interpretations, schools of thought, groups, parties and sects each laying claim to "True Islam". Mystical traditions as well as literalist traditions. Liberal traditions as well as conservative traditions.

When liberal Muslims accuse the literalists of being myopic & selective in how they interpret Islam they are right, but they forget to mention that they are also very selective. Each chooses to see what they want to see and interpret verses the way that suits them.

It's time we stopped playing this game of "True Islam" We are just reaffirming the same simplistic dichotomy of the extremists - the "Us verses Them" mentality. "I'm right you're wrong, so go to Hell!!" We are validating the very mentality that is the cause of our crisis.

There is no "True Islam"!! Yes, truth may exist in an absolute sense, but from our limited human perspective it is relative. How we perceive the truth of Islam is subject to our perspective, context, environment & a hundred and one other factors. As the Greek philosopher Protagoras, said: "Of all things the measure is Man." In other words truth as we human beings perceive it is relative to individual experience, judgement and interpretation. So yes there can be many versions of Islam. It doesn't mean truth doesn't exist, but only that from our imperfect perspective truth is elusive and amorphous. It is often subject to nothing more than skilful persuasion & victory in argument - as the sophists of ancient Greece showed us.

As I've mentioned before mankind is like the blind men in the Sufi tale who each describe a different part of an elephant, then argued fiercely over it. Now bear in mind I'm not talking about every day mundane truths we need to function in our lives, such as what will happen if I exit a building from a 10th floor window. I'm speaking specifically of truths related to God & metaphysical ideas. Such transcendental matters, by definition, are outside our reality and experience. It is not only foolish but arrogant to think that such flawed creatures as humans, could ever truly comprehend such matters, let alone communicate them to others in a way that wasn't bound to lead to misinterpretation and misunderstandings.

You might think that if truth is relative then ISIS have a perfect right to interpret the Qur'an the way they do and go around slaughtering people. Well in case you hadn't noticed they already do! Insisting there is only one "True Islam" - and it's the one you follow - has not made and will not make any difference to such groups as they will simply claim that it is their version - not yours - that is the "True Islam." - and so it will go on. They call you apostates and you call them apostates. They say you are going "completely against Islam" you say they are going "completely against Islam."

Let us stop all this nonsense and stop playing their game. We need to move away from this exclusivist mentality - this "Us & Them". The idea that there is one "True Islam" and if you don't fall into the definition then you are an unbeliever or an apostate. Rather than desperately trying to silence those who disagree with us, we need to allow an open and honest discussion. We need to do some genuine soul-searching and introspection.

Yes we can - and will - defeat groups like ISIS. But they will not be defeated by guns. You can't kill ideas with guns. They only re-emerge with a different name. Bad ideas will only be defeated in the long run by offering better ideas. By offering better solutions. This is how you defeat bad ideas - by opposing them with better ones. Letting them die a natural death from within, rather by force from the outside - which often only makes them stronger because they can focus on external threats rather than having to face internal realities.

To do this we need to widen the debate beyond traditional boundaries to allow fresh thinking and new perspectives. Our traditional scholars are stuck within narrow, worn-out dogma that belong to another age. They are trying to defeat the extremists using the same paradigm, by playing by the same game. Rather than fundamentally differing they only offer a slightly different emphasis or a more nuanced interpretation. We need to offer a completely different narrative. A universalistic and inclusive narrative. A pluralistic narrative that opens up what it means to be a Muslim to a much broader and humanistic understanding.

We need look again at how we view the source texts of Islam and challenge old and rigid perceptions that tie our hands and leave us unable to move forward. We need to be far braver than we are in tolerating and accepting criticism. Again I am not only speaking about criticism from non-Muslims - but much more crucially criticism from Muslims themselves. We must accept that Muslims can reject traditional views without calling them unbelievers, apostates and excommunicating them.

Let's stop blaming others and burying our heads in the sand. Let's open our eyes and ears and start listening to what others have to say from all sections of society including the minorities that we treat so badly. Let's start an honest dialogue with those with different views, with Ex-Muslims, Christians, Jews, Agnostics and Atheists too. Let's really engage with with the world and open up Islam to honest debate and scrutiny.

This is the only way we can truly defeat the narrow, exclusivist and literalist views of the extremists. They depend on fear - the fear we have of challenging what they claim is sacred and untouchable. The last thing they want is for us to kick down the door and allow the light of reason to shine onto them, for it will expose them for what they are. We should not fear challenging anything - even the so-called sacred. Who decided that this or that is sacred and untouchable? It's long overdue for us to reassess this false dichotomy between the sacred and profane, for in the imperfect and flawed human world, such a division does not exist.

فَذَلِكُمُ اللَّهُ رَبُّكُمُ الْحَقُّ فَمَاذَا بَعْدَ الْحَقِّ إِلاَّ الضَّلالُ
"Such is God, your Lord the Truth and what is beyond Truth but error?" (10:32)

God is the only truth - everything else is astray. In this world, at least, truth is relative and subject to perspective and interpretation والله اعلم and God know best.

10 comments:

  1. You're right. Since politicians have been tagging on to the end of their talks regarding extremism (particularly regarding ISIS who have "Islamic" in their title), "but ISIS have nothing to do with Islam," all that has done is generate debate from eg historians.
    Why do they do it? I can understand that they wouldn't say, "this has something to do with Islam," That would be political suicide, and is best left to those with knowledge and no votes to lose.

    So why not leave it out entirely? Just don't bother.

    Do they think that if they don't point it out, far-right extremists will be out on the streets, giving all Muslims a hard time? Well not really. While there has always been racist attacks in this country, and some spikes after eg the Woolwich murder, it isn't *that* bad, and besides, those people have already made their minds up that *all* Muslims are a problem anyway. So there's no point for that direction.

    I wonder if the likes of David Cameron have considered saying something like, "ISIS are using Islamic texts to a very literal point. This must be tackled within families, madrassas and mosques as the wrong teaching, as seen as a context of the past and not the present," Or something like that. It would be more honest, but it seems to me that any way he could be a bit more honest in tackling the problem, it would cause mayhem.

    So, politicians, don't bother at all.

    Then the discussion comes down to day to day things such as radio phone-ins, reflecting what they public say. I was struck last year, by the difference of how two radio presenters handled the common phone-in point of, "ISIS have nothing to do with Islam."

    A presenter, John Stapleton (very experienced) on LBC, replied with, "Nobody would argue with you about that." He later admitted he'd never read the Quran, which probably means he isn't aware of hadiths either.

    Meanwhile a presenter, Nihal on BBC Asian radio, replied to the point with, "But surely they can justify what they do via scripture?"

    A big difference in how radio presenters handle that particular question.

    What would happen if the situation was Christian groups running around killing people, basing it all on the books of the Old Testament? I'd guess it would be same, while we all scream, "But they are going by those books! So tackle it from that direction."

    Religion, particularly the "big" ones are untouchable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I think that people are putting the cart in front of the horse. We should not stop falling in the trap that western media is pumping non-stop: moderate Islam, true Islam, tolerant Islam etc. 
      Islam is Islam. 

      It is the followers some misinterpret, misrepresent and Misuse the name of Islam to forward their sick geo -political Ideologies and agenda. The Sooner, we Muslims - from Atheist two ultra zealots - and everybody in between would recognise this fact, the better for us and others. 

      Delete
    3. Dear Bashy, it is exactly here where you are mistaken: Islam is not just Islam! Just look at the Verse which Hassan has translated here, at the beginning of his argument: there are so many different English translations of this same Verse which means something different from being: "Allah is the truth..." that it is in fact impossible to say that "Islam is Islam." Do yourself a favour and compare all the available translations of this Verse on the internet, and see for yourself. When I did that, I could not even find a translation which says the same as Hassan's. When I translated this Verse into my mother tongue, Afrikaans, some years ago, by using the best available Commentaries, I did not get the same idea as that which Hassan is putting forward. (But Hassan has brought me now to go back to the drawing board.) And it is these differences in understanding of the different meanings of Quranic Arabic words, which created and still create an uncountable number of different Islams.

      Delete
  2. I think many would rather Muslims themselves take up the debate. Criticism from within is far more likely to hit home than criticism from nonMuslims due to paranoia about bigotry and hate towards Muslims which is often disguised in different ways.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also wish we Muslims would take up the debate and face up to the difficult questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really whole heartedly agree! For me as a 67 years old Revert from Protestantism(at age 52), this confusion in Islam is heart breaking and the saddest thing in the world.

      Delete
  4. As I've mentioned before mankind is like the blind men in the Sufi tale who each describe a different part of an elephant, then argued fiercely over it.

    This isn't a Sufi tale, it's a pre-Islamic (probably Greek) tale that became integrated into Muslim intellectual culture, not just by Sufis but also by jurists like Imam Shafi'i who quotes it in one of his legal texts.

    Interpretation of texts is important, but there's also the issue of pre-suppositions that people are brining to texts. A lot of Said Qutb's ideas for example aren't really based on a literalist reading of texts, but on his own pre-suppositions that he never questions. An example would be that if you implement Islamic law then all social ills will be removed. That's an ideological pre-supposition. It's certainly not historical, as many muslim states that had some version of Islamic law in pre-modern times still had many social practices that modern Islamists would dislike such as drug use.

    More importantly, a lot of things we label as "Islamist" have more to do with certain psychologies that exist among Sunni muslims in many places. The idea that everything used to be glorious and now everything is terrible and it's the new Jahiliyya. This to me is much more important in motivating radical Salafists and Qutbists than their hermeneutics. If you believe that everything is corrupt and getting more corrupt, then extreme acts and extreme interpretations don't seem so extreme in that context.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very good points, OrtegaSeason - your perspective much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  6. if you want find the true, just doing a simple thing. that things are doing 5 times sholat. which in our heart says that we worship to a god who created all things, who created heaven and earth.. suddenly your life become eazy, always find out the clue from a problem... that is my experience. and me too as agnostic muslim who kept my sholat in 5 times as i can do

    ReplyDelete